By Julie K. Ward
During this publication, Julie okay. Ward examines Aristotle's concept concerning how language informs our perspectives of what's genuine. First she areas Aristotle's conception in its old and philosophical contexts with regards to Plato and Speusippus. Ward then explores Aristotle's idea of language because it is deployed in different works, together with Ethics, issues, Physics, and Metaphysics, in an effort to reflect on its relation to dialectical perform and medical rationalization as Aristotle conceived it.
Read Online or Download Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science PDF
Similar greek & roman books
The Theaetetus is likely one of the most generally studied of any of the Platonic dialogues simply because its dominant subject matter issues the numerous philosophical query, what's wisdom? during this new interpretation of the Theaetetus, Paul Stern presents the 1st full-length therapy of its political personality in dating to this dominant subject matter.
This publication is a philosophical research of Plotinus' perspectives on sense-perception. It goals to teach how his strategies have been either unique and a improvement of the information of his predecessors, specifically these of Plato, Aristotle and the Peripatetics. precise awareness is paid to Plotinus' dualism with recognize to soul and physique and its implications for his perspectives at the senses.
Aristotle's treatise at the Soul figures one of the such a lot influential texts within the highbrow background of the West. it's the first systematic treatise at the nature and functioning of the human soul, offering Aristotle's authoritative analyses of, between others, feel notion, mind's eye, reminiscence, and mind.
Michael T. Ferejohn provides an unique interpretation of key issues in Aristotle's vintage works. The valuable historic thesis of this paintings is that Aristotle's commendation of the old Socrates for "being the 1st to pursue common definitions" is explainable partly through his personal charm to the "formal reason" (or definition-based) mode of clarification as supplying justification for medical wisdom.
- Aristotle's Physics
- Plotinus the Platonist:A Comparative Account of Plato and Plotinus' Metaphysics
- Aristotle's Theology: A Commentary on a Book of the Metaphysics
- Neoplatonism and Gnosticism
- Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues: The Parmenides, Theatetus, Sophist, and Statesman
Extra resources for Aristotle on Homonymy: Dialectic and Science
But clearly not to sensible equals, for these cannot be perfectly equal. 4 Platonic Eponymy and Participation 29 offers a metaphysical distinction comparable to that mentioned in Phd. 42 Although the homogeneous, invariable Forms stand in contrast to the heterogeneous, mutable particulars, there are also similarities. As mentioned, the particulars fall short of Forms, yet their dependency on and likeness to Forms are evident from the related terms that are used to refer to them. 43 Part of what this implies is that particulars bear likenesses to the Forms of the same name as they, having an internal connection to these Forms insofar as they are described as “striving after” (bouletai) and “desiring” (oregetai) the Forms.
132a6–8, Tim. , 990b15–17, 991a5–7; 1038b35–38; 1079a13–14. , Vlastos (1954), Allen (1965, 52–56), Malcolm (1991), and Meinwald (1995). Variant readings of 987b9–10 involve the use of homonyma ¯ over synonyma: ¯ Ab omits homonyma ¯ (oJmwvnuma) at 987b10, reading ton ¯ synonymon ¯ tois eidesin (twn sunwnuvmwn toiı εi[dεsin), while E reads ton ¯ synonymon ¯ homonyma ¯ tois eidesin (twn suwnuvmwn oJmowvnuma toiı εi[dεsin). 6 Aristotle and Plato on Homonymy 37 term is being used by him in one of the senses that Plato himself recognizes, namely, in the sense of sharing a certain character along with a name.
Pεri; twn εjcovntwn ta; εjnantiva εjlεvgomεn, εjponomavzontεı aujta; th/ εjkεivnwn εjpwnumiva/, nun dε; pεri; εjkεivnwn aujtwn, » n εjnovntwn ε [cεi th;n εjpwnumivan ta; ojnomazovmεna). , metechein, metalambanein) suggest emphasis on the way in which the Form possesses the character rather than the relation of resemblance. , 100d5–6: “[N]othing makes it beautiful but the presence or communion of the beautiful,” a claim that underscores that of 100c4–6: “[I]f anything is beautiful besides absolute beauty, it is beautiful for no other reason than that it partakes in the beautiful” (m tεvcεi εjkεivnou tou kalou, Phd.